When you think about the ancient concept of the Doctrine of Signatures, you may be tempted to agree with it, even if you are a sophisticated scientist. Simply put, the doctrine implies that plants which resemble parts of the body in shape or form would contain plant chemicals useful for healing ailments affecting that part. That is, if a fruit is shaped like the heart, it would contain chemicals that benefit the heart, or heal heart diseases. If it is shaped like the liver, then it would heal the liver An example is the liverwort, which was believed to heal the liver. Can we possibly discard this idea offhand, or do we need to intensify research to confirm at least some incidents of this fascinating possibility?
My mind went back to this doctrine after reading an article on the web today about an enzyme called tyrosinase, which is responsible for the metabolism of the amino acid tyrosine to form melanin. Tyrosine is itself derived from another amino acid called phenylalanine. If you don't have the enzyme needed to convert phenylalanine to tyrosine, you suffer from a condition called phenylketonuria. In the said article, scientists are developing a scan to detect the production of excessive amount of the enzyme tyrosinase, which converts tyrosine to melanin, and is implicated in human melanoma.
I had earlier observed that something that looked like human melanoma develops on ripe bananas. Through the article, I was pleasantly surprised that it is actually the same enzyme that causes the dark spots on bananas that also cause them in humans! This is not to say that the development of such spots on banana skin, similar to human skin, constitutes the signature doctrine in itself. But could this be a pointer to the fact that bananas could contain some ingredients for combating melanoma at certain stages of their ripeness. Think about it; a very ripe banana develops melanoma. Is it possible that fairly ripe ones without "banana melanoma" could contain chemicals which counteracts melanoma?
This could be a very good pointer to kind of roundabout Doctrine of Signatures!
My mind went back to this doctrine after reading an article on the web today about an enzyme called tyrosinase, which is responsible for the metabolism of the amino acid tyrosine to form melanin. Tyrosine is itself derived from another amino acid called phenylalanine. If you don't have the enzyme needed to convert phenylalanine to tyrosine, you suffer from a condition called phenylketonuria. In the said article, scientists are developing a scan to detect the production of excessive amount of the enzyme tyrosinase, which converts tyrosine to melanin, and is implicated in human melanoma.
I had earlier observed that something that looked like human melanoma develops on ripe bananas. Through the article, I was pleasantly surprised that it is actually the same enzyme that causes the dark spots on bananas that also cause them in humans! This is not to say that the development of such spots on banana skin, similar to human skin, constitutes the signature doctrine in itself. But could this be a pointer to the fact that bananas could contain some ingredients for combating melanoma at certain stages of their ripeness. Think about it; a very ripe banana develops melanoma. Is it possible that fairly ripe ones without "banana melanoma" could contain chemicals which counteracts melanoma?
This could be a very good pointer to kind of roundabout Doctrine of Signatures!